• Franklin
    link
    fedilink
    English
    103
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Private industry handling a public utility is never a good idea, see: Texas power grid

    internet should be treated like water and power and handled by the city.

  • @theluddite@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    301 year ago

    Vermont has several towns with as little as a thousand people that have fiber internet thanks to municipal cooperatives like ECFiber. Much of the state is a connectivity wasteland but it’s really cool to see some towns working together to sort it out.

  • @CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    291 year ago

    Aren’t local ISPs essentially banned in a lot of places due to lobbying from the big players? Less abandoned and more actively stomping on its throat.

    • Snot Flickerman
      link
      fedilink
      English
      111 year ago

      It was like that in all of Washington State from 1999 until it was repealed in 2021.

  • @bighatchester@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -41 year ago

    Where I live in Canada everyone thinks they need gigabit internet. My internet sales person was so sure that I needed at least 1 gig internet because I work from home and have a couple of people using YouTube at the same time . But I haven’t had a single issue with my 500 megabit internet . That was the lowest I could go , probably would of been fine with 200 - 300 .

    • @db2@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      201 year ago

      Because usable cellular Internet is relatively new, the cable/dsl/etc providers should have upgraded their systems literally decades ago and didn’t, funneling federal money intended for that purpose to CEO bonuses instead.

      • @ShepherdPie@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        cable/dsl/etc providers should have upgraded their systems literally decades ago and didn’t, funneling federal money intended for that purpose to CEO bonuses instead.

        So why look to them now like the other person was downvoted for asking? Nothing has changed and they still have no reason to run cable out to these communities.

    • @flatpandisk@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      131 year ago

      If they are so rural ISPs won’t take them, why would a cell company deploy 5G in a super sparse area?

      For example TMO and VZW will only hand out home cell modem if you live within half mile of a major interstate. If not out of luck aside from Starlink.

    • @TrickDacy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      Well I tried it for home Internet and it was mostly fine but was a little less reliable than wired. I think reliability is important.

  • @Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -121 year ago

    And not a mention about Starlink? To me it seems like the obvious solution compared to digging cables to an individual rural homes. Personally I use cellural but not everyone lives within the coverage of these towers. Satellite internet on the other hand is global.

    • @AlecSadler@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      141 year ago

      I tried Starlink, had high hopes, but unfortunately due to living sort of in a valley and being surrounded by numerous 100+ foot trees, service would cut out every 10-15 minutes. Wasn’t viable for video conferencing or large downloads.

      Cellular was OK, but the speeds could vary wildly and really only peaked at maybe 100/30.

      Ultimately, I ended up paying a local provider to bury a line directly to my house for me (well into the 5 figure cost). Worth it.