• @deranger@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2311 year ago

    The NCTA has repeatedly stated over the years that net neutrality rules aren’t needed because ISPs already follow net neutrality principles. “Internet service providers have always delivered open, unrestricted Internet service. Consumers enjoy the web content and applications of their choosing without any blocking, throttling, or interference,” the group said.

    Lmao, really? The audacity of these cunts.

    • Baron Von J
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1621 year ago

      Wow. Talk about professional gaslighting. Not enough people are aware that the Obama-era FTC enacted the policy because AT&T, Comcast, and Verizon were all caught throttling Netflix and prioritizing their own competing services.

      • @conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        23
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Maybe if they didn’t sell people more bandwidth than they could provide they wouldn’t have to throttle people below the service they paid for to work for everyone.

        I would, in theory, be all for allowing companies to prioritize latency to services and protocols that benefit from it. Except they oversell the absolute shit out of their service, and can’t be trusted to give you what you pay for if they don’t like your traffic.

        Failing to provide the full bandwidth they advertised for even one percent of a given month should result in fines that massively exceed what they charged for that month. Selling shit you don’t have is not acceptable.

    • @bisby@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      831 year ago

      Oh good, if that is all true, you wont have to change anything to be compliant with new laws and should have no issue with them.

    • @Socsa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      91 year ago

      It’s funny because wireless ISPs literally advertise that they throttle video to certain resolutions unless you buy a higher tier.

    • @Mango@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 year ago

      ROFL! Order today and you can get unlimited bandwidth for YouTube and Netflix specifically!

  • @Imprudent3449@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1101 year ago

    The cable lobby loves to bring up rural areas but when we gave them millions to build out they just took the money, said fuck it and did jack shit. I’m beginning to think that they prefer to under serve those areas and then use that as a bargaining chip to get everything they want.

    • @foggy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      471 year ago

      I am in New England. Looking to buy a home. The amount of area that is not covered at 100/10 is fucking criminal. Like, they upped my price this year. For what? Transferring packets didn’t get more expensive. Did you go e your employees raises? No? Are you expanding your infrastructure? No?

      Like what the fuck.

    • @AdmiralShat@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      221 year ago

      The power companies in my area started installing fiber on the power lines and running their own ISPs.

      No data caps or anything, I’m raw dogging these torrents at like 80 megabytes a second, I even started running my own home server

    • @Aecosthedark@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      71 year ago

      In Australia we watched American ISPs do exactly that and then we did the exact same thing with the exact same result because our politicians are corrupt pieces of shit with no backbone, integrity or ethics.

    • @Kiosade@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      The dumbasses that gave them the money should have made it so the companies did the work FIRST, then get reimbursed when they could prove they finished it. Whole thing was stupid.

    • @Nommer@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      Comcast for decades have said on their website they support my parent’s address but they obviously do not since there are no cables on the poles for Internet. We’ve tried calling and asking to fix it and we’ve tried calling to just get someone out so we can prove they don’t service it but each time we scheduled an appointment nobody showed up and when calling back they would say they never set one up. So I’m pretty sure you’re correct.

      • @irreticent@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        So I’m pretty sure you’re correct.

        I know they are correct:

        “By the end of 2014, America will have been charged about $400 billion by the local phone incumbents, Verizon, AT&T and CenturyLink, for a fiber optic future that never showed up.”

        TL;DR: they took billions from the government to build fiber infrastructure then said, “sorry that wasn’t enough. Give us more and we swear we’ll build it this time.” They just pocketed the money.

  • daikiki
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1051 year ago

    Eminent domain the final mile and be done with it. These companies have no business holding our national infrastructure hostage.

    • Uriel238 [all pronouns]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      321 year ago

      Taxpayers have already paid them billions for broken promises. It’s been long demonstrated the oligopolistic communications industry cannot be trusted to provide what the public needs at fair pricing.

      Its time to nationalize ISPs.

    • @jkrtn@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 year ago

      Fuck yes. Especially since the government already paid for infrastructure anyway.

  • @phoneymouse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    831 year ago

    Jessica Rosenworcel is a champ. She has been fighting this fight for years. The week Ajit Pai (Ashit Pie) ended net neutrality using falsified public comments, a group gathered in front of the FCC to protest the change. I went down there for a few hours and Jessica came to the window and waved to us.

    • @hansl@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      41 year ago

      Nah, just allow communities to build their local infrastructure. Trust me. You don’t need to threaten the status quo, just allow the market to compete.

      Every town where local fiber is available, Comcast and Spectrum suddenly have cheaper and more reliable service. It’s magical.

      • @WarlordSdocy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        I mean yeah that’s what monopolies do. They eliminate competition by either buying it out or lowering their prices/improving service to drive them out of business so they can then raise prices again. Just cause a small company can come in and make things better while they’re able to be around doesn’t mean we shouldn’t go after these monopolies and cut them down so they can’t have this power.

        • @hansl@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31 year ago

          Municipal broadband is not a small company though. It’s a cooperative owned by residents.

          And in many states it’s actually illegal. Which makes no sense.

          • @WarlordSdocy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            Probably companies like Comcast making sure there isn’t anything to disrupt their monopolies. Another reason to break them up so they can’t have that much power.

      • @spikederailed@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        I lived in Charlotte, NC when Google announced GFiber was coming. Instantly AT&T started running as much fiber as possible and Charter(spectrum) was trying to get people locked into cheaper 3 year contracts. Ultimately AT&T got fiber first so we went with them, and it was vastly better. Charter was getting 60% packet loss every night from oversold infrastructure they didn’t care to fix, as before the announcement the only competition was AT&T uverse in some parts of the city.

    • Boozilla
      link
      fedilink
      English
      301 year ago

      Works even better if you dye your skin orange and poop your pants.

    • ddh
      link
      fedilink
      English
      01 year ago

      The one thing I learned at Trump University

  • @NatakuNox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    531 year ago

    Can’t wait until my liberal city finishes our city owned isp. You can’t trust business to be in control of essential services

    • Saik0
      link
      fedilink
      English
      01 year ago

      Mentioning “liberal” here is a bit stupid. I’ve seen many conservative areas have unmetered gig fiber.

      Hell… where I live now is very conservative and I have 8gb uncapped.

      • Psychadelligoat
        link
        fedilink
        English
        01 year ago

        Wow, completely missed the key words:

        city owned

        Speed wasn’t mentioned at all

        • Saik0
          link
          fedilink
          English
          0
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          No. I didn’t. Several of what I’m referencing is city owned. Oops don’t you look stupid now.

          Edit: Also you’re linking your politics to companies trustworthiness, as if either side is doing anything worth a damn against shitty companies. Speed is going to be a direct comparison of markets that would outline if those companies are shitty or not… No? In either case you’re being stupidly obtuse in linking these 2 topics.

          • Dark Arc
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            It’s far more common for Democrat run municipalities to create municipal cable and for Republicans to outlaw (or propose outlawing) municipal cable state wide.

            It’s not even politicizing it’s a literal Republican talking point that the government should stay out of things and let free market competition sort these things out.

            The problem with that of course is that they’d rather take money from some regional monopolies than actually create a free market system with reasonable restrictions on it.

  • RedFox
    link
    fedilink
    English
    491 year ago

    Every piece of shit greedy corporation can’t hide from their lies when they say things are too expensive to implement correctly or pay people appropriately when they are simultaneously posting profits measured in billions…

    • @TheFriar@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      Those last couple paragraphs with the quotes from ISPs…make no fucking sense. They’re saying it will “restrict access for rural customers.” How? They say it’ll slow internet down across the nation. How? How can ARST.com just run those quotes and not even explain how they’re bullshit or even just call into question their reasoning? Shoddy journalism if you ask me.

  • @Buttons@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    20
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Let me plug Counter Points, a favorite political show of mine.

    They recently talked about FTC Chair Lina Khan and Apple’s monopoly, the government’s anti-trust lawsuit against Apple, and monopolies in general. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rMyChnACLKQ

    It’s tangential, but it came to mind.

    If the cable companies want lawsuits, let’s give them what they want in the form of anti-trust lawsuits and break them up.

  • @ATDA@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    201 year ago

    ‘We know we’re the bad guys so we’re going to announce our intentions like a comic book villain…’