• @Wxnzxn@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      92 years ago

      It’s pretty telling a platform like YouTube really only gets fully enjoyable with an adblocker, sponsorblock and this. I wish PeerTube had a lot of good creators, but last time I checked (years ago, admittedly) it was mostly conspiracy theorists and cryptobros.

      • @Molecular0079@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        72 years ago

        The problem with PeerTube is that there’s no built-in way for creators to get paid. If there are no ads or sponsors, then the only alternative is some kind of value for value system like what Podcasting 2.0 has. Until some kind of well integrated funding system gets built for PeerTube, creators really are not going to be incentivized to publish stuff on the platform.

      • SSTF
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Don’t forget the PocketTube extension, which allows you to sort subscriptions into self-made categories. Which is shockingly not a default feature.

    • @HughJanus@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 years ago

      I mean yes but also it’s not that hard. Google is not trying to give you a great experience, they’re trying to drive clicks to ads.

  • DumbAceDragon
    link
    fedilink
    English
    15
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    I did the opposite. I installed an addon that adds Mr Beast to every thumbnail.

  • @rtxn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    92 years ago

    I’ve used it for exactly three minutes and this is already amazing. I hope it gets integrated into ReVanced and Newpipe.

    • @Kyogen@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 years ago

      Thanks, I didn’t know revanced was a thing. I only enjoyed old vanced for briefly in its last days. So good to hear theres still options like this around.

  • Acid
    link
    fedilink
    English
    32 years ago

    Really good extension, I’ve added it to my browser.

    While some creators like Linus have said they dislike the clickbaity titles and thumbnails but they have to do it due to engagement that’s simply because the younger generations are the ones engaging with that content. As an older person I’d rather just have a to the point description of what I’m going to get.

    • @Tanoh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 years ago

      There is a reason clickbait images and titles are used, they work. If they didn’t work, no one would use them.

      • @eskimofry@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -12 years ago

        You must think marketing is made of infallible geniuses. Just because it exists doesn’t make it good.

        • scytale
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22 years ago

          They didn’t say it was good, just that it’s what works; that’s why it’s everywhere.

        • @Lumidaub@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          02 years ago

          Nobody said “good”, but if it keeps existing, it works or at least isn’t harmful. Bit like evolution.

          • @Rodeo@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            02 years ago

            Or there are people with an interest in keeping it that way.

            I don’t think there’s any big conspiracy about YouTube titles, but let’s not pretend thing like wealth inequality still exist because they’re not harmful.

            • @Lumidaub@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              12 years ago

              What “interest” would they have to keep it that way if it wasn’t working?

              Wealth inequality exists because it works for the people who have the power to control it. In a way, it’s not harmful ENOUGH to change evolutionarily.

              • @Rodeo@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -12 years ago

                Are you serious? You literally answered your own question with the very next sentence.

                • @Lumidaub@feddit.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  12 years ago

                  What? The original argument was “Just because it exists doesn’t make it good.”, implying that it (click-bait thumbnails) doesn’t necessarily work. To which I said that the fact that it exists means it works. To which you seemed to object by saying that there may be people who have an interest in it existing - like they want it to exist despite it actually not working. I’m confused about what it is you’re saying.

    • Raltoid
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Don’t forget that creators will release a video that you might want to watch later and then change the information.

      You’ll see a video you want to check tomorrow but not enough to add it to the “watch later”. But when you check your subscriptions the next day it’s been 12+ hours and they’ve changed the title and thumbnail to further game the algorithm.

    • SSTF
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      I don’t think it can be said to conclusively be an age issue. I assure you that many Boomers and older Xers love clickbait titles.

      It’s a more granular demographic than just age.

      • Acid
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 years ago

        Maybe but I can only go with my own anecdotal experience and It tends to be the younger audience more attracted to them.

        Of course, I fully admit I may be completely wrong.

  • QubaXR
    link
    fedilink
    English
    12 years ago

    Love the idea, but just to be the devil’s advocate, I think it will just mask garbage videos. Currently, the clickbait thumbnails and titles are an indicator to blacklist a channel, without having to waste time watching it.

    • @Ultraviolet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      32 years ago

      Unfortunately because of the way Youtube’s algorithm works, even high quality channels are buried if they don’t play the game.

    • @ajay@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      If you look at the DeArrow website and browser extension pages, I made sure to only use high quality channels as examples (Tom Scott, CGP Grey) to demonstrate how far reaching the sensationalism problem is.

      • @LichbaneLB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 years ago

        CGP Grey is personally painful to me. He used to be a no-nonsense education youtube legend, but in the last few years he’s just maximised clickability - even going thorugh his whole back catalogue and changing titles and thumbnails.

        For example, he made a great video about generative adversarial networks ~5 years ago but now its titled “How machines like ChatGPT learn” - despite coming out before GPT.

        • @dack@lemmy.world
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 years ago

          Pretty much every successful YouTube channel edits titles. It’s just part of the algorithm game now. You will often see videos cycle through several different titles shortly after release.

  • @tabular@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    0
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    This add-on needs to:

    • Store unlimited amount of client-side data
    • Access your data for sites in the googlevideo.com domain
    • Access your data for sites in the youtube.com domain
    • Access your data for sponsor.ajay.app
    • Access your data for dearrow-thumb.ajay.app
    • Access your data for www.youtube-nocookie.com

    This add-on may also ask to: **Access your data for all websites

    Is there a better option than for it to need unlimited amount of client-side data? Also, why “Access your data for all websites”?-

    • @ajay@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Creator of theq extension here, that is an optional permissions (may ask). It never asks to access to all sites, it only optionally let’s you add support for additional sites such as different Invidious instances. These are arbitrary domains, so it needs permission to ask for any arbitrary website.

      Support for invidious is not actually done yet, so right now, it never asks for permission for any new sites anyway

      The client side data is used to store your submissions to always show your preferred title, even if there is another submission on the server. You can disable this option in the settings

  • @YurkshireLad@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    02 years ago

    Google’s algorithm has forced people into using click bait thumbnails and titles. If they don’t attract more views and subscribers, then their channels are not pushed.

    • @FlagonOfMe@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      02 years ago

      Are you implying that content creators don’t themselves want more views and subscribers? Of course they do!

      “They only use thumbnails and titles that get views and subscribers because if they don’t… they won’t get views and subscribers since Google isn’t pushing their content.”

      That’s what it sounds like you’re saying.

      • @Chreutz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 years ago

        The point is that channel growth, clicks and interactions as a metric is used more for suggesting videos than relevancy and the likelihood that someone will watch a video to the end.

        This creates a click bait arms race between creators.

  • kratoz29
    link
    fedilink
    English
    02 years ago

    This sounds like a nice addon, sadly most of my YT consumption is done from my Nvidia Shield TV with STN, so I still get those annoying thumbnails I think (I have them in my home screen and that’s where I watch them or add them to the list to watch later within the Shield menu).