I’d expected this but it still sucks.

  • @Crogdor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1021 year ago

    There are two kinds of datacenter admins, those who aren’t using VMWare, and those who are migrating away from VMWare.

  • @brygphilomena@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    801 year ago

    Regrettably, there is currently no substitute product offered.

    I really don’t think you regret a God damn thing broadcom.

    • yeehaw
      link
      fedilink
      English
      25
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      If you’re already running windows, hyper-v. theres proxmox, and tons of others. So they are mistaken. 🤣

      • CazRaX
        link
        fedilink
        English
        111 year ago

        They mean that they aren’t offering another solution.

        • yeehaw
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          I know, but this is the way I read it when they claim to give no option.

      • TheHolm
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -81 year ago

        All of them not equate in same league. Do you know any type 1 free supervises out there? Xen probably.

        • yeehaw
          link
          fedilink
          English
          19
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Proxmox, Xen, hyper-v are all considered type 1 as far as I’m aware.

        • @Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          41 year ago

          I assume what you’re looking for specifically here is a complete platform that you can install on bare-metal, not just the actual hypervisor itself. In which case consider any of these:

          • Proxmox
          • XCP-NG
          • Windows Hyper-V Server Core (basically Windows Server Nano with Hyper-V)
          • Any Linux distro running KVM/QEMU - Add Cockpit if you need a web interface, or use Virt-Manager, either directly or over X-forwarding
          • Anarch157a
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            Any Linux distro running KVM/QEMU - Add Cockpit if you need a web interface, or use Virt-Manager, either directly or over X-forwarding

            No need for X forwarding, you can connect Virt-Manager to a remote system that has libvirt,

            • @Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 year ago

              This is true, but not everyone gets to use a linux system as their main desktop at work. I’m not aware of a windows version of virt-manager, but if that exists it would be fucking rad.

        • jelloeater
          link
          fedilink
          English
          01 year ago

          I’m not sure why you’re getting down voted, you’re right. I’m not sure if anyone would run Proxmox for their enterprise hypervisor? I mean HyperV is okay. Slim pickings for big orgs. I know there’s Nutanix, but most folks are moving to the big three for VMs and hosting.

          • @ssdfsdf3488sd@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            I am running proxmox at a moderately sized corp. The lack of a real support contract almost kills it, which is too bad because it is a decent product

  • @Moonrise2473@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    English
    591 year ago

    RIP VMware.

    Broadcom prefers to milk the top 500 customers with unreasonable fees rather than bother with the rest of the world. They know that nobody with a brain would intentionally start a new datacenter with VMware solutions

    • jelloeater
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      It’s really sad, they used to be amazing and the goto for running Linux VMs on back in the day. Still haven’t seen anyone do hardware pass through as well.

  • @mindlight@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    31
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Along with the termination of perpetual licensing, Broadcom has also decided to discontinue the Free ESXi Hypervisor, marking it as EOGA (End of General Availability).

    Wiktionary: Adjective perpetual (not comparable) Lasting forever, or for an indefinitely long time.

    Hello ProxMox here I come!

    • @kn33@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      61 year ago

      They’re terminating in the sense that they won’t sell it anymore. They’re not breaking the licensing they’ve already sold (mostly, there was some fuckery with activating licensing they sold through third parties)

      • @kalpol@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        Sort of. The activation license will work as long as you have it. They won’t renew support though, which effectively kills it when the support contract runs out.

        • @kn33@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          You won’t be able to upgrade to new versions when the support contract runs out, but you can install updates to the existing version as long as updates are made for it. This has always been the lifecycle for perpetual licensing. It’s good forever, but at a certain point it becomes a security risk to continue using. The difference here is they won’t sell you another perpetual license when the lifecycle is up.

    • @TCB13@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -28
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Hello ProxMox here I come!

      Proxmox is questionable open-source, performs poorly and will most likely end up burning the free users at some point. Get get yourself into LXC/LXD/Incus that does both containers and VMs, is way more performant and clean and is also available on Debian’s repositories.

  • Lettuce eat lettuce
    link
    fedilink
    English
    241 year ago

    XCP-ng or Proxmox if you need a bare metal hypervisor. Both open source, powerful, mature, and have large communities with lots of helpful documentation.

    I think you can migrate ESXi VMs directly to XCP-ng. I have moved onto it about 6 months ago and it has been solid. Steep learning curve, but really great once you get the hang of it, and enterprise grade if you need stuff like HA clustering and complex virtual networking solutions.

    • @Disaster@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      41 year ago

      I managed to migrate all mine to libvirt when I dumped esxi. They dropped support for the old opteron I was running at the time, so I couldn’t upgrade to v7. Welp, Fedora Server does just as well and I’ve been moving the VM hosted services into containers anyway.

      Ofc… well, we’ll see what IBM does with RedHat. Probably something like this eventually. They simply can’t help themselves.

  • @0110010001100010@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    231 year ago

    Really glad I made the transition from ESXi to Docker containers about a year ago. Easier to manage too and lighter on resources. Plus upgrades are a breeze. Should have done that years ago…

    • @kalpol@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      71 year ago

      I need full on segregated machines sometimes though. I’ve got stuff that only runs in Win98 or XP (old radio programming software).

      • @eerongal@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        English
        41 year ago

        I agree with the other poster; you should look into proxmox. I migrated from ESXi to proxmox 7-8 years ago or so, and honestly its been WAY better than ESXi. The migration process was pretty easy too, i was able to bring over the images from ESXi and load them directly into proxmox.

      • @TCB13@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -3
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Fear no my friend. Get get yourself into LXC/LXD/Incus as it can do both containers and full virtual machines. It is available on Debian’s repositories and is fully and truly open-source.

    • @TCB13@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -9
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      So… you replaced a property solution by a free one that depends on proprietary components and a proprietary distribution mechanism? Get get yourself into LXC/LXD/Incus (that does both containers and VMs) and is available on Debian’s repositories. Or Podman if you really like the mess that Docker is.

      • @kalpol@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        51 year ago

        I’ve seen you recommending this here before - what’s its selling point vs say qemu-kvm? Does Incus do virtual networking without having to straight up learn iptables or whatever? (Not that there is anything wrong with iptables, I just have to choose what I can learn about)

        • @TCB13@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          41 year ago

          Does Incus do virtual networking without having to straight up learn iptables or whatever?

          That’s the just one of the things it does. It goes much further as it can create clusters, download, manage and create OS images, run backups and restores, bootstrap things with cloud-init, move containers and VMs between servers (even live sometimes). Another big advantage is the fact that it provides a unified experience to deal with both containers and VMs, no need to learn two different tools / APIs as the same commands and options will be used to manage both. Even profiles defining storage, network resources and other policies can be shared and applied across both containers and VMs.

    • @TCB13@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 year ago

      This was totally expected, even before BCM bought them. This is the same thing we had with CentOS/ReadHat and that will happen with Docker/DockerHub and all the people that moved from CentOS to Ubuntu.

  • RedFox
    link
    fedilink
    English
    11 year ago

    What about virtualizing windows?

    Only thing I know of is hyperv, but it’s not widely used I don’t think and MS is pushing azure $tack right?