@Wilshire@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 1 year agoScarlett Johansson denied OpenAI the right to use her voice. They used it anyway.boingboing.netexternal-linkmessage-square164fedilinkarrow-up11.11Karrow-down165
arrow-up11.05Karrow-down1external-linkScarlett Johansson denied OpenAI the right to use her voice. They used it anyway.boingboing.net@Wilshire@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 1 year agomessage-square164fedilink
minus-square@Suavevillain@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish161•edit-21 year agoMost of AI just seems to be blatant theft and copyright issues.
minus-square@Blackmist@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglish80•1 year agoNo, it’s only theft when it’s poor people doing it. When it’s rich people, it’s fair use of a publicly available resource.
minus-square@kibiz0r@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglish11•edit-21 year agoThat’s pretty much the whole point. Making use of other people’s work and likeness in a way that removes any obligations you would normally have to those people. Just clearly define “copyright violation” for them, and they’ll craft a method that technically eludes your definition.
Most of AI just seems to be blatant theft and copyright issues.
No, it’s only theft when it’s poor people doing it.
When it’s rich people, it’s fair use of a publicly available resource.
That’s pretty much the whole point.
Making use of other people’s work and likeness in a way that removes any obligations you would normally have to those people.
Just clearly define “copyright violation” for them, and they’ll craft a method that technically eludes your definition.
Not in this case.