• @kevin@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1571 year ago

    We have seen this game 100 times. Opt in for now and then turned on for everyone 6-12 months later. It’s just a temporary move to handle the bad PR.

    • Gormadt
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1011 year ago

      You forgot the best part

      Silently turned on via “security” update

      • zen!th
        link
        fedilink
        English
        601 year ago

        It’s a security update because it adds new security vulnerabilities.

      • @WhoIsRich@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        171 year ago

        Or the other trick of constantly prompting “Turn on / Maybe Later” until people either accidentally accept or just give up to make nagging stop.

        • ddh
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          That guy at the club who won’t fuck off

    • @merthyr1831@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      321 year ago

      registry switch that’ll mysteriously reset itself. we’ve had this shit with countless windows configurations at work that our IT guy has to battle with on the regular.

      • @conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        51 year ago

        I’ve had so many people jump down my throat for listing some of the many obviously fucked things Microsoft did on my PC just over the life of Windows 10. (And not that it should matter, but I even paid for Pro).

        I turned all their various advertising and spying “features” off through legitimate settings, group policies, whatever, and the list of things that reverted themselves over time was insane.

          • @conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            31 year ago

            If they were giving away Windows for free, their behavior would still be unforgivable.

            There is no scenario where any operating system including spyware or ads can ever theoretically be acceptable behavior. Any person who contributes in any way to that happening belongs in a prison cell.

              • @conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                41 year ago

                Linux is free qnd plenty sustainable.

                If you can’t support providing something for free via a mechanism that isn’t pure and unadulterated evil, then don’t do it for free. “We have to be monsters to make money” is not a valid position.

                  • @conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    21 year ago

                    That’s not true at all. It has a huge market share, just not in desktops.

                    But again, that’s completely and utterly irrelevant. If being evil is the only way for your business/product to exist, it does not deserve to exist.