• TJA!
      link
      fedilink
      English
      30
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Some days ago I read an article here that said that a lot of the money came from Russia and that they are getting exactly what they wanted: chaos

    • @Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      159 months ago

      No one has ever explained how bankers are losing. They say they’ve lost money. Yet the only details are Musk has to make payments and put up Tesla stock as collateral. That a no lose for the banks. They don’t care if Tesla stock crashes, they are making money from selling it.

      • @CaptainPedantic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        269 months ago

        If Tesla’s stock crashes, then the value the banks could get from selling it is much lower.

        If Twitter and Tesla go bankrupt, the banks will have loaned out billions to own something worthless.

        At least I would assume that’s how it works.

        • Vanth
          link
          fedilink
          English
          49 months ago

          Careful there, bud, you’re singing the siren song of bank bailouts.

          • Uriel238 [all pronouns]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            The proletariat is still sore about the ones in 2008. They revealed plain the stratified economic system.

      • @lone_faerie@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        89 months ago

        It’s because when banks make loans, they sell of the debt, but nobody has wanted to buy the debt for Musk’s loans. My understanding of this is essentially, if someone takes out a loan of $100 million, the bank will sell that debt to an investor for $101 million, and the investor will make back $102 million once the loan is paid off due to interest. But no investors are confident enough that Musk will pay back his loan so no one is ponying up the dough to buy it.