• Jojo, Lady of the West
    link
    fedilink
    English
    119 months ago

    Or if there were 45 services, but they all basically had everything, rather than all of them having basically nothing

    • @sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      5
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Exactly. I’d be fine with picking my favorite streaming service and adding on a bundle for some additional content. As in, I could get Netflix for $10/month, and add Disney+ content for another $5 or whatever.

      That way I can pick the service I want without losing the content I want, and the content creators still get paid for their content while keeping prices for most people low.

      That’s kind of how Steam works, I can buy any game I want and both Steam and the dev get paid. Or I can buy the game through the dev directly and the dev gets a bigger cut. I’ll choose Steam if the experience there is better, or I’ll choose the dev if they provide a good experience. That should be how streaming works…

      • skulblaka
        link
        fedilink
        English
        19 months ago

        God, it’s cable TV packages all over again. Streaming was supposed to destroy this problem, not become it!

        • @sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          19 months ago

          The problem with cable TV was that I still can’t watch what I want, when I want. With streaming, I can. But the more services there are with exclusives, the more apps I need to get the content I want.

          If I can pick the content I want at any streaming service, then the choice becomes about which streaming service I want, not what content I want. I hate juggling apps, and I’d rather pay a bit extra on one app to get more content than continually switch apps.