shoulderoforion to Technology@lemmy.world • 6 months agoBig loss for ISPs as Supreme Court won’t hear challenge to $15 broadband lawarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square14fedilinkarrow-up1308arrow-down13file-text
arrow-up1305arrow-down1external-linkBig loss for ISPs as Supreme Court won’t hear challenge to $15 broadband lawarstechnica.comshoulderoforion to Technology@lemmy.world • 6 months agomessage-square14fedilinkfile-text
minus-square@LovingHippieCat@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish159•6 months agoI wish this wasn’t being framed with “Big loss for corporations” and instead was being framed as “Big win for consumers.”
minus-square@chakan2@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish22•6 months agoExcept it’s not. I was excited when I read the headline…it’s only for people under an income threshold. It’s going to turn broadband into healthcare as they try to make up that profit.
minus-squaresunzu2linkfedilink14•6 months ago it’s only for people under an income threshold. Thank you for the service of actually reading the article
minus-square@Sludgehammer@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish2•6 months agoInsert They’re_the_ same_picture.jpg here.
minus-square@Passerby6497@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish6•6 months agoIn outcome, sure. But there’s a very big difference in the meaning behind the story.
I wish this wasn’t being framed with “Big loss for corporations” and instead was being framed as “Big win for consumers.”
Except it’s not. I was excited when I read the headline…it’s only for people under an income threshold.
It’s going to turn broadband into healthcare as they try to make up that profit.
Thank you for the service of actually reading the article
Insert They’re_the_ same_picture.jpg here.
In outcome, sure. But there’s a very big difference in the meaning behind the story.
I would expect better from ars