Stats from here: https://lemmy.fediverse.observer/dailystats

Like, has an instance gone down and if so, why hasn’t there been a comparable drop in users and comments?

Edit: Thanks to @example@reddthat.com here for pointing to zerobytes.monster becoming more aggressive against bots as the likely culprit.

  • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed
    link
    fedilink
    English
    8
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    There are secret tankies. But instance admins do not like tankies.

    If they start denying/downplaying Tiananmen Massacre, they will get banned.

    dbzer0 is just very anti imperialism of all types, USA, Russia, China, is all bad.

    The admin db0 does have a distrust in democracy and the electoral process and they have a “don’t vote in elections” stance which I have voiced my disagreement with, and I have not been banned.

    I’ve citicized USA, Russia, China and not been banned. db0 seems to be sympathetic to Ukraine in the Russo-Ukrainian war.

    TLDR: dbzer0 are not tankies

    • db0
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 month ago

      The admin db0 does have a distrust in democracy

      Clarification: Representative/Capitalist democracy. Not all types of democracy.

      • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed
        link
        fedilink
        English
        01 month ago

        Since we’re on this topic, what do you think about the referrendum/initiative process that some jurisdictions have, such as in Switzerland?

        • db0
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 month ago

          I’m not familiar with it

          • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            In Summary:

            There are 3 things:

            Popular Initiatives - Swiss Citizens Collect 100,000 signatures within 18 months and the proposal is put on the ballot in the mext election. If a majority approves, it becomes law.

            Legislative Referrendum - If the legislature passes a law, citizens can call for a referrendum by collecting 50,000 signatures within 100 days of the law being passed, and it goes on the ballot in the next election. If a majority disagrees with the law, it’s repealed.

            Mandatory Referrendums - In some situations, such as changes to the constitution, a referrendum is mandatory. A majority of the people and a majority of the Cantons (Sub-National divisions similar to States/Provinces) have to be in favor otherwise the changes wont happen.

            Basically, the elected officials are more like caretakers than people with actual power. It’s not perfect tho, people could still vote in bad laws and racist/xenophobic policies.

            Read more about them here:

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voting_in_Switzerland#Referrendums

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_popular_initiative

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mandatory_referendum_in_Switzerland

            • db0
              link
              fedilink
              English
              1
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              While this seems better than a lot of others, these types of systems are very easily manipulated by mass media, so functioning inside capitalism is already a massive problem. In any case it’s difficult to judge the efficacy, only with one rich protected nation as an example. The biggest thing is that labour is pacified a lot by a high standard of living, which is supported by the imperialism of the other nations supporting them.

      • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 month ago

        Oh, I’m talking about this: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/33041848/15271204

        db0 (instance admin) said voting is pointless… I disagreed

        My point is: If this were .ml, I’d be banned (just check .ml’s modlogs lol), but this is not .ml, actual leftists can disagree and its fine. It’s funny how the fake leftists (tankies) get so mad and arbitarily bans for daring to disagree.