• Ulrich
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -6215 days ago

    Copies of messages are also known as archives.

    • tehsYs
      link
      fedilink
      English
      5015 days ago

      Signal does not archive messages on server side

      • Ulrich
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -55
        edit-2
        15 days ago

        They weren’t talking about the server:

        This app…works in almost exactly the same way as Signal, except that it also archives copies of all the messages passing through it, shattering all of its security guarantees.

        • @ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          5215 days ago

          Later in the article, it talks specifically about the server-side archives being stored in plain text. That’s why the hacker was able to access messages. This isn’t about the local copies on phones.

          • Ulrich
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -6215 days ago

            Yeah I didn’t read past the misinformation

              • Ulrich
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -29
                edit-2
                14 days ago

                You’re confused, I am not the author of this article. I did not write the statement above, just copied and pasted it here.

                • @AbidanYre@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  1914 days ago

                  I’m not confused, you’re intentionally misreading what’s happening for some reason.

                  “Passing through it” pretty clearly refers to the server as that’s what was hacked into and had plain text archives.

                  You’re hyper fixating on the fact that the article says “the app” when referring to both the phone and server pieces to try and argue… something.

                  • Ulrich
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    -3314 days ago

                    You are confused. I’m not “intentionally misreading” anything, it was written incorrectly. I’m not trying to argue anything. I’m just reading the (wrong) words used in the article. When I come across a piece of misinformation, I don’t continue reading in the hopes that they clear it up later, I write it off and close it.

                    Someone else cleared this up. There’s no reason to continue arguing about it.

            • @doodledup@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              1714 days ago

              Maybe you should start reading up on stuff you don’t know about before adding nonsense to internet threads.

              • NekuSoul
                link
                fedilink
                English
                1114 days ago

                This is now the third post in the last 24 hours where I stumble into a needlessly long thread because this user is completely obtuse and can’t handle being wrong or a different opinion.

              • Ulrich
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -28
                edit-2
                14 days ago

                Don’t know what you mean. I didn’t add any “nonsense”. Just a direct quote from the article in question.

          • @0xD@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -215 days ago

            That doesn’t really do anything. Attackers need local access to the device to get the database itself. Chances are, they’ll get the key right with it.

              • @0xD@infosec.pub
                link
                fedilink
                English
                114 days ago

                The passphrase or the unencrypted database are still open in memory. Though that is, of course, a more complicated attack but they could simply read it through the app itself.

                • @HappyTimeHarry@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  214 days ago

                  You can set it to wipe them from memory on different conditions, including instantly if youre that paranoid, sure its still possible. Its an optional feature most people wont use, but its pretty well thought out.