• @Thorry84@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2313 hours ago

    You are right in how wasteful it is, especially since it turned out a lot of those satellites don’t even make it to 4 years.

    However there is zero risk of space trash with Starlink. They orbit so low, it’s basically within the atmosphere still. They need to constantly boost themselves, otherwise they fall down and burn up. So these satellites are coming down within years all on their own, even without any controlled disposal.

    It’s insanely wasteful, but it keeps SpaceX in business launching every week, which is kind of the point. But at least there isn’t a Kessler syndrome waiting to happen.

      • @anomnom@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        58 hours ago

        It’s not enough, but I would bet it might have a cooling effect as it reflects more light in the upper atmosphere.

        But we should really still make sure, and more importantly not trust Elon with any data flowing over those satellites.

        • @trailee@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          44 hours ago

          It might! But the article I linked also suggests it might destroy ozone and have a net warming effect. We just don’t know. The upper atmosphere has never before had this level of direct pollution injection.