• Snot Flickerman
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -81 year ago

    You’d think businesses wouldn’t want to give all their communications to… a bigger business, especially one currently invested in AI training.

    It would be like a company doing mapping/GIS stuff using Gmail for communications. You’re just handing your data over to your largest competitor. It’s fucking stupid.

    • @explore_broaden@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      301 year ago

      When you’re an enterprise client paying serious money for the service, there are often data protection requirements. They have the capability to support things like export controlled information or HIPAA compliance in office, and appropriate legal agreements ensuring data protection. It’s the power of collective bargaining (they are buying 100s++ licenses instead of just one).

      • @MirthfulAlembic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        91 year ago

        Exactly. If it’s a regulated industry, they’re not just paying for Teams. They’re paying for someone else to worry about meeting certain compliance requirements and take the heat if things go wrong. I’m not sure how many companies besides Microsoft can offer that. At most it’s a fraction of the available options.

        • Flying Squid
          link
          fedilink
          English
          3
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Facebook is usually not used by businesses which expect it to be in compliance with compex healthcare regulations, the law is spelled HIPAA, and that article is about the UK, which doesn’t have that law.