• AItoothbrush
    link
    fedilink
    English
    253 days ago

    Ive been using adblockers, piped and other tools for so long that i dont even remember what the last time was when i saw a youtube ad.

    • @chinchillas@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      23 days ago

      Hard to do if you watch directly from your TV using some dongle and don’t know or can’t modify your router to block ads.

      • @Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        4
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        SmartTube is on AndroidTV

        Kodi can be installed through the play store, you can transfer files over smb and ftp and move the apk using it.

        You’re welcome.

        Excuses:

        I use a Roku or Roku TV

        Don’t, buy a $25 Android TV box from walmart.

        I use AppleTV

        Don’t, buy a $25 Android TV box from walmart.

        FTP? SMB? Apk? What are these, words?!

        These terms can be searched for and learned about.

        Why not just use Kodi?

        You’re ahead of the game, find a plugin pack and enjoy

  • @sunglocto@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    50
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Here is every single way I can think of to block YouTube ads:

    uBlock Origin + Firefox

    NewPipe on Android

    Libretube on Android

    uYou+ on iOS

    FreeTube on *NIX and Windows

    yt-dlp + mpv

    YouTube Revanced

    Invidious self hosting

    Piped self hosting

    And finally, last and definitely least

    YouTube Premium

    Donate to the creators who make content. Google does not deserve a penny of your hard earned money.

  • @LettyWhiterock@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    213 days ago

    Occasionally I try the YouTube watch together thing on discord with my SO, and it really shows just how completely unusable YouTube is without an ad blocker.

    • @Bluewing@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      53 days ago

      The only ads I see are on a local sports podcast. The advertisers are all local businesses. From restaurants to local credit unions. And those I’m fine with.

  • z3rOR0ne
    link
    fedilink
    English
    66
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Ublock Origin on Firefox With Sponsorblock is the answer.

    Edit: Mispelling, fuck autocorrection

    • @amorangi@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      344 days ago

      By operating youtube at a loss for many years Google acted anticompetitively to kill competition or stop competition arising. Now that they’ve achieved that they can do what they like. Don’t feel bad using ad blockers against this anti-capitalist company.

        • Chaotic Entropy
          link
          fedilink
          English
          24 days ago

          And suppression of comments, for all sorts of reasons. Words and phrases will constantly flag AI autoremoval.

      • Anas
        link
        fedilink
        English
        54 days ago

        I am in no way defending YouTube here, but how did it act anticompetitively?

      • @atlien51@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        13 days ago

        I never felt bad abt that for a second. Like the thought never crossed my kind XD FUCK YOUTUBE!

    • Chaotic Entropy
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Hosting and storage costs, few can afford to be an alternative to an absolutely gigantic video storage platform that costs obscene money to maintain.

      • That Weird Vegan
        link
        fedilink
        English
        23 days ago

        I am causing a netloss to googs. I don’t pay for Google plus or whatever, and j don’t view their fucking ads. Win win if you ask me.

        • Chaotic Entropy
          link
          fedilink
          English
          03 days ago

          It was fun to thumb my nose at Google while it lasted I guess, maybe if they were less amoral then I’d be less belligerent toward them.

        • Chaotic Entropy
          link
          fedilink
          English
          5
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          Sure, a service that manages an infinitely smaller amount of content and complexity. It is a situational tool, hardly a YouTube killer… the banner presented on the homepage professes that it’s expensive to run and please donate.

          • Glog78
            link
            fedilink
            03 days ago

            @ChaoticEntropy

            https://fediverse.party/en/peertube/ << before you complain understand the technology behind. Everyone can basically provide a instance and it’s decentral. As more people participate / as more instances are provide as better for all and as cheaper. If you really want to step away from services like youtube and want to have it sustainable (aka not depending on business) than it’s your best choice. If you just want someone else to have the saying and replace one company with another good luck.

    • @Tregetour@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      4
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      People get proccupied with emulating YT, which is indeed cost prohibitive. But that response assumes one is emulating all of it. What about only pursuing sections of it to cater to particular audiences? Serving 100% of YT’s video might be too much even for Amazon (for example) but what about 1%?

      Why couldn’t Amazon host Booktube? And the manga/anime enthusiasts and other varietes of weebs to go along with them? They already own ebook retail. A VOD service to chip off some of YT’s viewership would be a more productive investment than The Rings of Power…

      A YT competitor needs a bit of scale, sure, but not as much as YT itself. A fraction will do.

      • @howrar@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        13 days ago

        I believe the main cost is in hosting all the videos. A lot of them are probably junk that were never meant to see the light of day. I certainly use it as an extra backup for many of my videos with no context and random UUID titles.

        For everything else, a potential solution is to have everyone come in with their own videos hosted elsewhere and the platform just integrated with a bunch of APIs for fetching and serving those videos. For small time creators, the cost should be fairly low to none since a lot of platforms allow you to store a small number of files for free.

    • @GrumpyDuckling@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      54 days ago

      OK, so a bittorrent tracker site with a video player built in with comments underneath and you can get perks from content creators for seeding. Then of course some kind of voting system and etc. Then a creator can just get a seed box to start hosting their own videos.

      • @atlien51@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        64 days ago

        You’re right :)

        I meant idk something like Oddysse (but a website with actual moderation)

        • @ewenak@jlai.lu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          4
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          Do you know of PeerTube? It’s not mainstream at all either, but it seems more known to me.

          It’s also in the fediverse, and isn’t accused of the same moderation issues (though idk if PeerTube is really better than Odyssee at moderation, I suppose it’s just a difference in policy).

          Edit: I read a bit about it, and I can see I was wrong about Odyssee being less known than PeerTube. It’s strange, I never heard of it, but anyway. Odyssee also includes some crypto bullshit, so yeah…

    • @prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -1
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      It’s a very difficult business model to make profitable without an already massive userbase. In fact, I think YT was actually losing money for Google for a while after they bought it. I could be misremembering though.

      • @atlien51@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        33 days ago

        Yes but not everything needs to make a profit, just not make a loss. Also it could be community supported with donations and stuff:)

        • @prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          YouTube was operating at a loss under Google for years. The only reason it is able to exist is because a massive entity like Google was able to absorb that without folding, and keep providing a free service until it becomes profitable (is it even yet? I’m not sure).

          I mean fuck Google, and yes a big enough non-profit (or even government) could do it (probably better), but unfortunately that’s not the world we live in right now.

      • @captainlezbian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        84 days ago

        Ive been blocking youtube ads for like a year now. But when it was like one or two minutes every 10-20 I didn’t mind watching on an app that didn’t have ad block. It got worse and I got fed up.

      • @Nindelofocho@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        24 days ago

        Not the previous commenter but on mobile, a good few years ago I didnt block ads i didnt mind something skippable or a short interruption but they were just that very short and not in the way. I started going out of my way to block ads when they abused it

  • Beej Jorgensen
    link
    fedilink
    English
    755 days ago

    I’m not worried. The minute the ad blockers stop working I’ll finally be able to do something else with my time.