• Ekky
    link
    fedilink
    English
    439 months ago

    So now LLM makers actually have to sanitize their datasets? The horror

      • Ekky
        link
        fedilink
        English
        139 months ago

        Oh no, it’s very difficult, especially on the scale of LLMs.

        That said, we others (those of us who have any amount of respect towards ourselves, our craft, and our fellow human) have been sourcing our data carefully since way before NNs, such as asking the relevant authority for it (ex. asking the post house for images of handwritten destinations).

        Is this slow and cumbersome? Oh yes. But it delays the need for over-restrictive laws, just like with RC crafts before drones. And by extension, it allows those who could not source the material they needed through conventional means, or those small new startups with no idea what they were doing, to skim the gray border and still get a small and hopefully usable dataset.

        And now, someone had the grand idea to not only scour and scavenge the whole internet with no abandon, but also boast about it. So now everyone gets punished.

        At last: don’t get me wrong, laws are good (duh), but less restrictive or incomplete laws can be nice as long as everyone respects each other. I’m excited to see what the future brings in this regard, but I hate the idea that those who facilitated this change likely are the only ones to go free.

      • Ekky
        link
        fedilink
        English
        39 months ago

        You don’t have to sanitize the weights, you have to sanitize the data you use to get the weights. Two very different things, and while I agree that sanitizing a LLM after training is close to impossible, sanitizing the data you give it is much, much easier.

  • @gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    319 months ago

    Imo this is not a bad thing.

    All the big LLM players are staunchly against regulation; this is one of the outcomes of that. So, by all means, please continue building an ouroboros of nonsense. It’ll only make the regulations that eventually get applied to ML stricter and more incisive.

  • don
    link
    fedilink
    English
    169 months ago

    AI centipede. Fucking fantastic.

  • @BetaDoggo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    16
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    How many times is this same article going to be written? Model collapse from synthetic data is not a concern at any scale when human data is in the mix. We have entire series of models now trained with mostly synthetic data: https://huggingface.co/docs/transformers/main/model_doc/phi3. When using entirely unassisted outputs error accumulates with each generation but this isn’t a concern in any real scenarios.

  • @paddirn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    109 months ago

    So kinda like the human centipede, but with LLMs? The LLMillipede? The AI Centipede? The Enshittipede?

  • @kowcop@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    39 months ago

    I always thought this is why the Facebooks and Googles of the world are hoovering up the data now

  • @floofloof@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    19 months ago

    Maybe this will become a major driver for the improvement of AI watermarking and detection techniques. If AI companies want to continue sucking up the whole internet to train their models on, they’ll have to be able to filter out the AI-generated content.

    • @silence7@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      19 months ago

      “filter out” is an arms race, and watermarking has very real limitations when it comes to textual content.

      • @floofloof@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        19 months ago

        I’m interested in this but not very familiar. Are the limitations to do with brittleness (not surviving minor edits) and the need for text to be long enough for statistical effects to become visible?

        • @silence7@slrpnk.netOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          29 months ago

          Yes — also non-native speakers of a language tend to follow similar word choice patterns as LLMs, which creates a whole set of false positives on detection.

  • @TriflingToad@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    19 months ago

    we already have open source AI. This will only effect people trying to make it better than what stable diffusion can do, make a new type of ai entirely (like music, but that’s not a very ai saturated market yet), or update existing ai with new information like skibidi toilet

  • @Chickenstalker@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -29 months ago

    Well then, here’s an idea for all those starving artists: start a business that makes AND sells human-made art/data to AI companies. Video yourself drawing the rare Pepe or Wojak from scratch as proof.